"The masses are incurably ignorant" Plato
A drag racing car lost control and careened into a crowd of spectators and killed 6 people. Sad and tragic without question. However what is mind boggling is how the thing happened in the first place? Who is more at fault here...the idiot spectators who come to watch this where there clearly is no safety? Or the stupid criminal organizers who said something to this effect "We've been doing this for years and nothing ever happened like this". So Einstein organizers, does that make it right? Clearly you are candidates for the Darwin award.
I'm at a loss trying to understand how this could have even taken place. What year is this again? Please don't tell me it is because it is in the south and that's what they do. The district attorney said he has not yet decided whether to bring criminal charges. Oh really? How are you going to arrest the entire town of clowns for being so stupid?
"It ain't really safe to do anything with drag cars on a city street," according to 19-year-old Garett Moore, who said he was about 15 feet from the wreck but was uninjured. "They shouldn't have done it." THANK YOU CAPTAIN OBVIOUS!
I've been to a super speedway where there was a crash and a few people got killed. They kept the race going, but I left. The race wasn't important anymore to me when I heard some people died. However, that was clearly an accident. Because of that accident they did move to make those fences higher and improve car technology. In the case of this drag racing event...it was clearly stupid with no safety measures taken.
Idiots!
6.18.2007
6.10.2007
We don’t need Kansas City. We need our league back.
This is from a friend of mine Michael Arturo who wrote me back, after I posted my disgust at the death of the NHL. Michael is a Hollywood actor and has appeared in many films and TV. Check out his site , you can see some of his movies there too.
In the wake of a Stanley Cup playoffs that broke records for irrelevance and low ratings, with empty seats in both new and established markets, coming off the infamous "Preakness Game" that highlighted the worst TV package in sports, the worst commissioner in sports and the lingering hangover from two suicidal lockouts, what does the NHL think is the answer?
Expansion.
If this wasn't the NHL, we'd think it was a joke. But as the Sports Business Journal reported, the league is moving toward adding a 31st and 32nd franchise in those noted hockey hotbeds of Las Vegas and Kansas City.
Yes, that ought to do it.
Hey, instead of trying to fix the apathy in your current markets, why not add new ones. Las Vegas may be good news for Janet Gretzky and Rick Tocchet, but since the NHL can't beat Law & Order reruns, what chance does it have against The Strip?
Look, if the league wants to further strangle itself with expansion, why not Chicago? It hasn't had a team since Bill Wirtz disbanded the Blackhawks in the mid-1990s.
Only the NHL could even dream this stuff up. The league needs to contract, not expand. It needs to improve the product, not disperse the talent, dilute rivalries and provide another slap at the game's tradition.
No offense to Vegas and KC, but we've seen this act before. The few million in expansion fees isn't worth adding a couple more cities that aren't all that interested in hockey, save the core of 10-15,000 fans who will still be paying attention once the novelty wears off.
As for Commissioner Gary Bettman, well, he hasn't overseen many good ideas in his first 15 years on the job. At this point our only hope is that his various disasters in leadership were part of a secret 16-year plan and good things are about to happen.
A past expansion under his watch – slogan: "If you've got two Winn Dixies, welcome to the NHL" – gave us the Nashville Predators. This year Nashville, despite having an exciting, hard-hitting and winning team, violated its lease by failing to draw an average of 14,000 fans. The local government may have to buy the remaining tickets next year, a tremendously prudent use of tax money.
Who among us isn't shocked, just shocked, to find out that a small market, football mad Southern city wasn't all that interested in an NHL team after all? Yep, no one could have seen that one coming.
Nashville may get moved to the Kitchener-Waterloo region of Ontario. The punch line isn't that Ontario has a Kitchener-Waterloo region. It's that at this point, it's a pretty good option.
That's how low this league is.
At least people actually like hockey in Ontario. They just won the Stanley Cup in Anaheim, but you could walk two blocks from the arena and not know the NHL was in town. As for local TV ratings, if they had staged a Zamboni jacking, complete with low-speed police pursuit through the streets of Irvine, it'd have drawn 10 times the ratings.
This is being driven by the league's Board of Governors (owners) who could care less about the long-term health of the league as long as they get guaranteed profit and a tax boondoggle.
Forget the best interests of the NHL; the owners want to expand so they can execute a quick money grab.
As Eric Duhatschek points out in Canada's Globe and Mail, the rumored expansion fee is $150 million per franchise and the owners don't have to share that revenue with the players.
This sounds like a lot, but per owner it is only about $10 million before taxes. For the mega rich – some of these guys are billionaires – that's nothing. Besides, rampant expansion to small and non-traditional markets is what forced the league to have to fight for the salary cap that shut down the entire 2004-05 season and helped create this mess. The expansion money was Fool's Gold then. It's no different now.
The inherent problem is the NHL is owned and run by too many people with no respect for the game or the fans.
Not to turn this into one of those sappy baseball documentaries (although maybe that's what we need) but to so many fans hockey remains an emotional experience: the memories and history, the old days with your dad, the new ones with your kids, the shared joy of victories, the thrill of great performers and the chills of a sport where the athletes literally walk on water.
The NHL has forced so many of those fans to voice their anger by staying away, not buying, not watching, not caring. Unfortunately, rather than get this league to change course it's emboldened them to bleed the sport dry.
Fans are disillusioned, disappointed and disenfranchised. And what else would they be at this point? The game is great. The league stinks. We want our old NHL back; fewer teams not more, owners that want to win, not bilk taxpayers, real television coverage, not something that's on before bull riding.
If there are any owners who do still care, any who want to save this league before it is truly too late, they need to stand up today, beat back the expansion crowd, fire the failed commissioner and buy out the deadbeat owners so they close up the dead end franchises.
We don't need Vegas. We don't need Kansas City. We need our league back.We don't need Vegas.
copyright 2007 www.hockeydino.com
In the wake of a Stanley Cup playoffs that broke records for irrelevance and low ratings, with empty seats in both new and established markets, coming off the infamous "Preakness Game" that highlighted the worst TV package in sports, the worst commissioner in sports and the lingering hangover from two suicidal lockouts, what does the NHL think is the answer?
Expansion.
If this wasn't the NHL, we'd think it was a joke. But as the Sports Business Journal reported, the league is moving toward adding a 31st and 32nd franchise in those noted hockey hotbeds of Las Vegas and Kansas City.
Yes, that ought to do it.
Hey, instead of trying to fix the apathy in your current markets, why not add new ones. Las Vegas may be good news for Janet Gretzky and Rick Tocchet, but since the NHL can't beat Law & Order reruns, what chance does it have against The Strip?
Look, if the league wants to further strangle itself with expansion, why not Chicago? It hasn't had a team since Bill Wirtz disbanded the Blackhawks in the mid-1990s.
Only the NHL could even dream this stuff up. The league needs to contract, not expand. It needs to improve the product, not disperse the talent, dilute rivalries and provide another slap at the game's tradition.
No offense to Vegas and KC, but we've seen this act before. The few million in expansion fees isn't worth adding a couple more cities that aren't all that interested in hockey, save the core of 10-15,000 fans who will still be paying attention once the novelty wears off.
As for Commissioner Gary Bettman, well, he hasn't overseen many good ideas in his first 15 years on the job. At this point our only hope is that his various disasters in leadership were part of a secret 16-year plan and good things are about to happen.
A past expansion under his watch – slogan: "If you've got two Winn Dixies, welcome to the NHL" – gave us the Nashville Predators. This year Nashville, despite having an exciting, hard-hitting and winning team, violated its lease by failing to draw an average of 14,000 fans. The local government may have to buy the remaining tickets next year, a tremendously prudent use of tax money.
Who among us isn't shocked, just shocked, to find out that a small market, football mad Southern city wasn't all that interested in an NHL team after all? Yep, no one could have seen that one coming.
Nashville may get moved to the Kitchener-Waterloo region of Ontario. The punch line isn't that Ontario has a Kitchener-Waterloo region. It's that at this point, it's a pretty good option.
That's how low this league is.
At least people actually like hockey in Ontario. They just won the Stanley Cup in Anaheim, but you could walk two blocks from the arena and not know the NHL was in town. As for local TV ratings, if they had staged a Zamboni jacking, complete with low-speed police pursuit through the streets of Irvine, it'd have drawn 10 times the ratings.
This is being driven by the league's Board of Governors (owners) who could care less about the long-term health of the league as long as they get guaranteed profit and a tax boondoggle.
Forget the best interests of the NHL; the owners want to expand so they can execute a quick money grab.
As Eric Duhatschek points out in Canada's Globe and Mail, the rumored expansion fee is $150 million per franchise and the owners don't have to share that revenue with the players.
This sounds like a lot, but per owner it is only about $10 million before taxes. For the mega rich – some of these guys are billionaires – that's nothing. Besides, rampant expansion to small and non-traditional markets is what forced the league to have to fight for the salary cap that shut down the entire 2004-05 season and helped create this mess. The expansion money was Fool's Gold then. It's no different now.
The inherent problem is the NHL is owned and run by too many people with no respect for the game or the fans.
Not to turn this into one of those sappy baseball documentaries (although maybe that's what we need) but to so many fans hockey remains an emotional experience: the memories and history, the old days with your dad, the new ones with your kids, the shared joy of victories, the thrill of great performers and the chills of a sport where the athletes literally walk on water.
The NHL has forced so many of those fans to voice their anger by staying away, not buying, not watching, not caring. Unfortunately, rather than get this league to change course it's emboldened them to bleed the sport dry.
Fans are disillusioned, disappointed and disenfranchised. And what else would they be at this point? The game is great. The league stinks. We want our old NHL back; fewer teams not more, owners that want to win, not bilk taxpayers, real television coverage, not something that's on before bull riding.
If there are any owners who do still care, any who want to save this league before it is truly too late, they need to stand up today, beat back the expansion crowd, fire the failed commissioner and buy out the deadbeat owners so they close up the dead end franchises.
We don't need Vegas. We don't need Kansas City. We need our league back.We don't need Vegas.
copyright 2007 www.hockeydino.com
6.09.2007
Liberty - Politicians With No Coin
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. Politicans with no money or financial war chests in the millions usually have no change. I don't care, becasuse I will vote on principal, not popularity.
Why I'm supporting Ron Paul.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
He was against taking 600 million from funding the war in Afghanastan to fund operations in Iraq.
Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress.
He believes in the principles of the Constitution
He believes in a strong national defense and military
He questions why we are building large bases in Iraq, yet can take care of our wounder soldiers at Walter Reed?
He wants to abolish the IRS.
The clowns and big business puppets (Clinton, Obama, McCain, Romney, and Guiliani) will raise your taxes, take your guns, take your rights, and sell you down the river to line their political pockets. Enough is enough.
Why I'm supporting Ron Paul.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
He was against taking 600 million from funding the war in Afghanastan to fund operations in Iraq.
Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress.
He believes in the principles of the Constitution
He believes in a strong national defense and military
He questions why we are building large bases in Iraq, yet can take care of our wounder soldiers at Walter Reed?
He wants to abolish the IRS.
The clowns and big business puppets (Clinton, Obama, McCain, Romney, and Guiliani) will raise your taxes, take your guns, take your rights, and sell you down the river to line their political pockets. Enough is enough.
by
Hockeydino
at
Saturday, June 09, 2007
1 comment:
Links to this post
Labels:
Libertarin,
McCain,
Obama,
politics,
Republican,
Romney,
Ron Paul
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
What I Write About
ADD
(64)
add rumblings
(62)
Ron Paul
(43)
hockey dino
(22)
Liberty
(20)
Red Wings
(20)
chicks
(20)
rush limbaugh
(15)
attention deficit disorder
(14)
detroit
(14)
truth
(13)
Libertarian
(12)
tea party
(9)
Beautiful women
(8)
Liberals
(8)
nobama
(8)
Blame the Libertarians
(7)
Comfort foods
(7)
Sports
(7)
dino hockey
(7)
hot chicks
(7)
palin
(7)
trust
(7)
Baseball
(6)
Rush
(6)
liberal puke
(6)
liberalism
(6)
marriage
(6)
Critical thinking
(5)
Dating
(5)
Drunk Driving
(5)
Football
(5)
Gary Bettman
(5)
King Obama
(5)
Lions
(5)
NHL
(5)
Paleo conservatism
(5)
Rand Paul
(5)
Revolution Manifesto
(5)
Ron Paul Revolution
(5)
twitter hockeydino
(5)
Recession
(4)
Ron Paul farewell speech
(4)
Ron Paul girl
(4)
The Detroit Lions
(4)
music
(4)
narcisstic
(4)
observing
(4)
women drivers
(4)
Ayn rand
(3)
My Christmas List
(3)
Objectivism
(3)
Playoff hockey
(3)
Smart
(3)
Sports slappys
(3)
Valentine's Day ideas
(3)
celebrities
(3)
choices
(3)
democrats
(3)
loud music
(3)
Facism
(2)
Government motors
(2)
Hope vs. Faith
(2)
Music lists
(2)
Obamanation
(2)
Patriotism
(2)
Positive Attitude
(2)
Republican Debate
(2)
Republican hypocrisy
(2)
Sports Commandments
(2)
Tebowing
(2)
capitalism
(2)
ex girlfriend
(2)
gay marriage
(2)
hoodies
(2)
man rules
(2)
nba sucks
(2)
sexist
(2)
smoking in front of kids
(2)
today show sucks
(2)
Attention whores
(1)
Hooters
(1)
Libertarin
(1)
Michael Skupin
(1)
NDAA
(1)
ROn Paul on change
(1)
Rock and Roll
(1)
Ron paul delegates walk
(1)
SOPA
(1)
Sexy
(1)
Those That Don't Know They Don't Know
(1)
Women Behaving Badly
(1)
altruism
(1)
censorship
(1)
collecting
(1)
dumocrats
(1)
evel knieval
(1)
gop thugs
(1)
high maintenance
(1)
higher taxes
(1)
hoochies
(1)
libertarian smoking
(1)
likes you just as friend
(1)
martin luther king
(1)
metro sexual shirt
(1)
molyneaux
(1)
nbc sports sucks
(1)
obama lover
(1)
old school sports
(1)
playing baseball
(1)
progressives
(1)
random thoughts
(1)
revolution -
(1)
revolution march
(1)
ron paul delegates
(1)
ron paul independants
(1)
ron paul third party
(1)
separation of church and state
(1)
sheep
(1)
sheople
(1)
smoking idiots
(1)
the herman letters
(1)
truth sports liberty chicks
(1)
types of chicks
(1)
types of women
(1)
tyranny
(1)
women money
(1)
This Disclosure & Privacy Policy is valid from 29 December 2009
Disclosure Policy:This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog accepts forms of cash advertising, sponsorship, paid insertions or other forms of compensation.
This blog abides by word of mouth marketing standards. We believe in honesty of relationship, opinion and identity. The compensation received may influence the advertising content, topics or posts made in this blog. That content, advertising space or post will be clearly identified as paid or sponsored content.
The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider. This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.
Privacy Policy: Hockeydino respects your privacy.
Any personal information you provide to us including and similar to your name, address, telephone number and e-mail address will not be released, sold, or rented to any entities or individuals outside of Hockeydino.
Any personal information you provide to us including and similar to your name, address, telephone number and e-mail address will not be released, sold, or rented to any entities or individuals outside of Hockeydino.
External Sites Hockeydino is not responsible for the content of external internet sites. You are advised to read the privacy policy of external sites before disclosing any personal information.
Cookies A "cookie" is a small data text file that is placed in your browser and allows Hockeydino to recognize you each time you visit this site(customisation etc). Cookies themselves do not contain any personal information, and Hockeydino does not use cookies to collect personal information. Cookies may also be used by 3rd party content providers such as newsfeeds.
Remember The Risks Whenever You Use The Internet While we do our best to protect your personal information, we cannot guarantee the security of any information that you transmit to Hockeydino and you are solely responsible for maintaining the secrecy of any passwords or other account information. In addition other Internet sites or services that may be accessible through Hockeydino have separate data and privacy practices independent of us, and therefore we disclaim any responsibility or liability for their policies or actions. Please contact those vendors and others directly if you have any questions about their privacy policies.